THE CRITIQUE
The verbal agreement has been made and the work has been sent. What now?

Take Good Notes While Reading
My advice is to take lots of notes, especially if you’re reading a whole manuscript. How you take those notes is up to you. I usually start out by typing them into my notes app and include page numbers as I like to include examples if I’m going to mention repetitious words, spelling errors or a particular scene or interaction that I feel should be looked at. If I find a problematic scene, my brain comes up with alternate ways to work out the issue as well, and I will jot that down so when I type everything up I can remember what I was thinking. Some manuscripts need a little more refining than others, we’re all in different places on our writing journey, so in those cases, I will type my commentary directly in the margins.
CONFESSION: I rarely share my notes with the writer as I tend to jot things down stream of consciousness, and, in all honesty, those thoughts can be abrasive. Welcome to my brain. I want to give the writer constructive criticism, not harsh commentary, so those notes are for me to remember what I was thinking at the time before I massage the words into something useable.

*The End*
Okay, so you’ve read what you agreed to read, and now it’s time to put your thoughts down for sharing. You loved it and have very little commentary. You hated it and can’t bear to tell them. You got through it but loved some parts and hated others.
All of these and more are very real possibilities when you beta read.
The trick to feedback is taking all the judgement out of your reply and instead focusing on the technical pieces. I am always honored that writer’s trust me with their work, and I start or end every critique by telling them so. Here is a blanket statement I include in almost every critique, and I mean EVERY word, EVERY time I type it.
“Thank you for trusting me with your words. I know how scary it can be to share your work, and I hope I made this process easier for you. Reading is very subjective, and what I love someone else may not. What doesn’t work for me may be someone else’s perfect escape. Take everything I say with a grain of salt and keep what suggestions make sense for you, and disregard the rest. In the end, this is your story and your vision, and I respect that.”
Every person I’ve ever read for can attest that I’ve told them something very similar, and, as I said, I mean EVERY word. I am humbled to be trusted by strangers, and thrilled to read stories that no one else has read yet. I’m even more honored to know that some random seed of thought I planted might actually help a writer turn the corner on working out plot issues or smoothing over a rough patch of words that the writer was initially too close to see.
How do I structure the critique?
I’ve written and re-written this section for clarity because, the truth is, every critique I write is different so the format and headings change based on what feedback I think is most important to give and how well I know the reader. I tend to touch on the following categories in every critique in one way or another:
*Characters
*World Building
*Slow Spots
*Voice
*Plot
*Technical Stuff (grammar, spelling, sensitivity issues, etc.)
*Overall Thoughts
After my initial acknowledgement of thanks and disclaimer of subjectivity, I jump into the details.
Start With the Positive. I Can’t Say This Enough.
THINGS I LOVED (no joke, that is usually exactly how I write the first critique heading in all caps and bold to set my thought categories apart. See also: THINGS THAT WORKED FOR ME)
It’s important to remark on the things that worked and personally, I think it’s good form to list them first.
Start with the positive to build the reader up for any “suggestions” to follow. No matter how “thick” our skin is, if we handed our book over to someone to read, we must feel a little okay with what we’ve written. My job is to offer my thoughts as one reader, not to make anyone feel bad. Creativity is so intensely personal and should be treasured. Writing is a gift and I support anyone chasing their dreams or having the courage to express themselves. Even the most prolific authors started with some draft somewhere that was a raging dumpster fire. (I’m guessing, of course, but don’t understand how it can’t be true)

It’s a fact that not all reads are going to tickle your fancy every time, and there may be times when you’re “stretching” for a list of things you loved, but I look at it like this, if someone took the time to write a 300 page book and asked me to read it, I can take the time to celebrate their talent and commitment with positive thoughts. If you’ve made your life easier and started with the 3 chapter premise I mentioned in Part 2 of this blog, that helps make this easier for all involved. Saves you from dragging yourself through 300 pages you can’t connect with.
Following are some items that could be used as celebratory comments:
-a particular character, or group of characters that were funny/ entertaining/ resonated with you/ were strong/ had great chemistry/ made you think, etc.
-note any scenes that stood out in your mind as stronger pieces of writing.
-strong/ quirky/ funny/ entertaining voice.
-any world building that caught your eye, worked for the story, was particularly creative.
-strong beginning or strong end.
-good dialogue skills (let’s face it, writing strong dialogue that sounds conversational and not stiff takes particular finesse, praise it when you see it)
-great attention to historical detail
-strong character chemistry
I could go on and on, but the point is, find things that went right and help the author celebrate all those things. Most of the time you won’t have to reach for ideas, but if you do, those are some areas to look at.
Now For the Criticism
I always label this part THINGS I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO SEE DIFFERENT or sometimes I simply label it SUGGESTIONS. That depends on my mood, how open the writer is to feedback and how well I know them. I have a wicked, dry sense of humor and some of my closest friends get to see that in my critiques. I think I’m funny, but not everybody appreciates comments like “bitch this dude has to go.”
Any time you read a book, you know what works for you in the story and what doesn’t. Translate that to the author, but keep it technically based. Some of you may not agree with me, but I always find a way to put a positive spin on a constructive comment. I’ll give some examples: (and these are not real examples but made up for the purposes of this blog)
You didn’t like the ending– “This story had me by the throat all the way through but I have to be honest, my heart was hoping Jake would end up with Terry.” or “I’m so glad Jake and Terry ended up together but I felt like I wanted the final scene to punch me in the feels a little more, what if he said XXX and she ran away…”
There were slow spots in the story– “I enjoyed your characters’ banter so much but when they kept flashing back to childhood memories in the middle of their secret meet-ups it took me out of the action. Those flashbacks are great but maybe they would work better after your characters kiss and go home for the night.” or “I couldn’t get enough of their chemistry and I found the childhood flashbacks a little distracting in the middle of their sexy banter. If you feel those memories are critical to the story line maybe pop them in a different spot. While they were really well written, I might suggest for word count that they don’t need to be there at all, but that’s your call.”
You disliked a character that wasn’t meant to be disliked– “This character has such a great arc, but in all honesty I found myself not rooting for them because they are bit too abrasive to the other characters and I wanted so badly to love them. Maybe cut down the number of times they kick everyone in the shins and boost up the heartfelt moment when they cry about their dog so the reader really sees they deserve this good stuff you have coming their way.”
The voice wasn’t compelling– “I found that for such a strong character I really wanted to feel their power in their words. Maybe try using more descriptive words for the color of the wood or the smell of the sweetgrass when they describe their childhood home so the reader can actually picture that farmhouse and pull us deeper into the setting.” or “I wanted your main characters voice to be a little more concise. She’s built to be such a smart girl but her words rambled in parts that drew away from her smarts. See pages 155 and 251 where she says…”
Of course these are extremely general and made up examples, but you can see what I’m saying. Comments worded in a direct but more helpful way like that will be received better and show the writer where they lost you rather than “I hated that character.” “The voice is boring.” “I just couldn’t get into the ending” “I didn’t buy the whole premise.” “Your plot confused me”
As readers, our opinions are always entirely our own. I feel it’s not for us to say a book was good or bad, or a character sucked, or the story went nowhere. We may feel that, but to point out something that didn’t work, to tell the author what your reader brain wanted in that moment, and then to give samples of what you are saying is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. Simply slamming something because you didn’t like it is judgement.
Whew! Why do I feel like I’m going to get some criticism on that. Someone out there is going to say I’m an ass kisser. I will politely disagree. I’m telling an author what didn’t work for me as ONE reader and offering suggestions on what might make it sing a little louder. (See how sweet and helpful that sounds?) I am not a paid editing professional but I have read enough to know (and paid editors for their advice on my own work enough) to get a feel for what works.
You can be brutally honest and give your thoughts without breaking someones spirit. It’s all in the way you word it.
Overall Thoughts
I end each critique with a wrap up of what I feel are the easiest, most beneficial thoughts for revision, throw in a few positives to remind them I enjoyed it, but again remind them to take the advice that fits and leave the rest.
That’s really the basics of what I feels makes a beta relationship easier.
Up Next in Part 4: Beta and Critique Partner Resources (Where to find one) and Talking About Paid Editors










